Midwestern Beech-Maple Forest

EVT 7313North-Central Interior Beech-Maple Forest
CES202.693GNRTreeHardwood
Summary
This system is found primarily along the southern Great Lakes ranging from central Indiana to southern Ontario. It is typically found on flat to rolling uplands to steep slopes with rich loam soils over glacial till. This system is characterized by a dense tree canopy that forms a thick layer of humus and leaf litter leading to a dense and rich herbaceous layer. Acer saccharum and Fagus grandifolia comprise up to 80% of the canopy. Canopy associates can include Quercus rubra, Tilia americana, and Liriodendron tulipifera with Carpinus caroliniana and Ostrya virginiana common in the understory and subcanopy. The relative dominance of sugar maple compared to other tree species varies across the range of this system based on regional climate and microclimate. The herbaceous layer is very diverse and typically includes spring ephemerals. Some common species include Arisaema triphyllum, Osmorhiza claytonii, Polygonatum biflorum, and Trillium grandiflorum. The primary natural disturbance influencing this system includes wind-driven gap dynamics. Conversion to agriculture has significantly decreased the range of this system, and very few large stands remain intact.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Environment
This system is typically found on flat to rolling uplands to steep slopes with rich loam soils over glacial till. It occurs principally on medium- or fine-textured ground moraine, medium- or fine-textured end moraine, and silty/clayey glacial lakeplains. Sand dunes and sandy lakeplains can support these systems where proximity to the Great Lakes modifies local climate (within 10-20 miles of the shore, evapotranspiration conditions are suitable for mesic forest). Prevalent topographic positions of this community are gentle to moderate slopes and level areas with moderate to good drainage. Where mesic southern forest occurs on steeper slopes, it is often associated with northern to eastern exposures which receive low amounts of direct sunlight and are characterized by a cool, moist microclimate.

It can occur on a variety of soil types, but loam is the predominant texture. The diversity of soils which can support this system include sand, sandy loam, loamy sand, loam, silt loam, silty clay loam, clay loam, and clay. Soils are typically well-drained with high water-holding capacity and high nutrient and soil organism content. High soil fertility is maintained by nutrient inputs from the decomposition of deciduous leaves which enrich the top layer of soil (Cohen 2004).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Dynamics
Small-gap development and replacement due to tree death is the prevalent disturbance factor influencing this system. Catastrophic fire and/or wind can impact this system over long return intervals but are rare. Tree canopy tends to be closed so understory plants receive little light after leaf-out in the spring. This system could form large stands or be part of a large forested landscape in conjunction with other forested types, resulting in a relatively high proportion of forest interior to forest edge.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Threats
The greatest impacts on this system are due to conversion of the surrounding landscape to agriculture, logging, and grazing. This system occurs on relatively fertile soils and many areas have been converted to or affected by agricultural uses. Other sites have been subject to selective or clearcut logging. Outright conversion to crops or clearcut logging destroys the affected area and has greatly reduced the range of this system. Remaining stands are also impacted by these activities on the surrounding landscape. Agricultural and urban development, road construction, and logging create gaps in formerly large blocks of forest. These serve as vectors or preferred habitat for invasive and aggressive native species, some of which thrive in the forest edge habitat but do not favor the interior of large forested stands (e.g., brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater)) (Howell et al. 2005). The structure and composition of stands near the edge is different from the interior (Palik and Murphy 1990). White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) populations have increased significantly due to their preference for fragmented landscapes and elimination of top carnivores. Browse pressure at these high population levels can have significant effects on forest composition and structure (Rooney and Waller 2003).

Many of the remaining stands are farm woodlots that have been subject to continual anthropogenic pressures. The structure and composition of the remnants have been altered by selective logging, grazing, removal of snags and logs for firewood, deer herbivory, exotic species invasion, and human-introduced diseases (e.g., Dutch elm disease and chestnut blight) (Cain 1935, Curtis 1959, Brewer 1980, Parker et al. 1985, Donnelly and Murphy 1987, Robertson and Robertson 1995). Many fragments are dominated solely by Acer saccharum, which was often left to provide maple syrup and is favored in gaps created by selective logging. In addition, Fagus grandifolia was often culled because of its poor timber value. Conversely, many stands that were high-graded of valuable timber (i.e., sugar maple and red oak) are now beech-dominated (Cohen 2004).

Invasive species often spread after fragmentation and repeated disturbance (i.e., logging). Invasive plant species that threaten the diversity and structure of this system include Acer platanoides, Alliaria petiolata, Berberis thunbergii, Celastrus orbiculata, Elaeagnus umbellata, Frangula alnus (= Rhamnus frangula), Hesperis matronalis, Ligustrum vulgare, Lonicera japonica, Lonicera maackii, Lonicera morrowii, Lonicera sempervirens, Lonicera tatarica, Lonicera x bella, Lonicera xylosteum, Rhamnus cathartica, Rosa multiflora, and Viburnum opulus (Kost el al. 2007).

Beech bark disease can be a threat to the health of this system. This fungal disease can kill up to 50% of Fagus grandifolia trees in newly infected stands and reduces the vigor of remaining trees (Witter et al. 2005).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Distribution
This system is located in the southern Great Lakes from central Indiana north into southern Ontario, and east to northwestern Pennsylvania and western New York.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Ecologically Associated Plant Species

Plant species that characterize this ecosystem type, organized by vegetation stratum. These are species ecologically associated with the ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific area.

Tree canopy

Acer saccharum, Fagus grandifolia, Fraxinus americana, Ostrya virginiana, Quercus rubra, Tilia americana

Tree subcanopy

Carpinus caroliniana

Short shrub/sapling

Rubus variispinus

Herb (field)

Arisaema triphyllum, Osmorhiza claytonii, Polygonatum biflorum, Trillium grandiflorum
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Ecologically Associated Animals (8)

Animal species ecologically associated with this ecosystem type based on NatureServe assessment. These are species whose habitat requirements overlap with this ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific roadless area.

Mammals (3)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Indiana MyotisMyotis sodalisG2
White-footed DeermousePeromyscus leucopusG5
Eastern Gray SquirrelSciurus carolinensisG5

Reptiles (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Ring-necked SnakeDiadophis punctatusG5

Amphibians (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Eastern Red-Backed SalamanderPlethodon cinereusG5

Butterflies & Moths (2)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Early HairstreakErora laetaG2G3
West Virginia WhitePieris virginiensisG4

Insects (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
American Burying BeetleNicrophorus americanusG3
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
At-Risk Species Associated with this Ecosystem (4)

Species with conservation concern that are ecologically associated with this ecosystem type. G-Rank indicates global conservation status: G1 (critically imperiled) through G5 (secure). ESA status indicates U.S. Endangered Species Act listing.

Common NameScientific NameG-RankESA Status
Early HairstreakErora laetaG2G3--
Indiana MyotisMyotis sodalisG2Endangered
American Burying BeetleNicrophorus americanusG3Threatened; Experimental population, non-essential
Vicksburg BlackberryRubus variispinusG1?Q--
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Component Associations (2)

Plant community associations that occur within this ecological system. Associations are the finest level of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) and describe specific, repeating assemblages of plant species. Each association represents a distinct community type that may be found where this ecosystem occurs.

NameG-Rank
Acer saccharum - Fagus grandifolia - Betula spp. / Maianthemum canadense ForestG4 NatureServe
Fagus grandifolia - Acer saccharum Glaciated Midwest ForestG2 NatureServe
State Conservation Ranks (5)

Subnational conservation status ranks (S-ranks) assigned by Natural Heritage Programs in each state where this ecosystem occurs. S1 indicates critically imperiled at the state level, S2 imperiled, S3 vulnerable, S4 apparently secure, and S5 secure. An ecosystem may be globally secure but imperiled in specific states at the edge of its range.

StateS-Rank
INSNR
MISNR
NYSNR
OHSNR
PASNR
Methodology and Data Sources

Ecosystem classification: Ecosystems are classified using the LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type (EVT) layer, mapped to NatureServe Terrestrial Ecological Systems via a curated crosswalk. Each EVT is linked to the USNVC (U.S. National Vegetation Classification) hierarchy through pixel-level co-occurrence analysis of LANDFIRE EVT and NatureServe IVC Group rasters across all roadless areas.

Vegetation coverage: Coverage percentages and hectares are derived from zonal statistics of the LANDFIRE 2024 EVT raster intersected with roadless area boundaries.

Ecosystem narratives and community species: Sourced from the NatureServe Explorer API, representing professional ecological assessments of vegetation composition, environmental setting, dynamics, threats, and characteristic species assemblages.

IVC hierarchy: The International Vegetation Classification hierarchy is sourced from the USNVC v3.0 Catalog, providing the full classification from Biome through Association levels.

Component associations: Plant community associations listed as components of each NatureServe Ecological System. Association data from the NatureServe Explorer API.

State ranks: Conservation status ranks assigned by NatureServe member programs in each state where the ecosystem occurs.