Northeastern Pine Barrens

EVT 7354Northeastern Interior Pine Barrens
CES202.590GNRTreeConifer
Summary
These pine barrens occur on glacial sandplains of the inland regions of the northeastern U.S., with a disjunction to the distinctive till plain shrublands in the Poconos of eastern Pennsylvania. Substrates include outwash plains, stabilized sand dunes, and glacial till. The soils are consequently coarse-textured, acidic, mostly well-drained to xeric, and low in nutrients. Pinus rigida is the usual dominant, and cover may range from closed-canopy forest to (more typically) open woodlands. Quercus rubra, Pinus strobus, and Betula populifolia are common associates. A tall-shrub layer of Quercus ilicifolia and/or Quercus prinoides is commonly present, although portions of some barrens (or occasionally the entire barrens) lack the scrub oak component. A well-developed low-shrub layer is typical, with lowbush Vaccinium spp., Gaylussacia baccata, and Comptonia peregrina characteristic, with Rhododendron canadense characteristic on the slightly more mesic microsites of the Poconos. The system is often a physiognomic patchwork, ranging from nearly closed-canopy forest to open pine woodlands, to scrub oak shrublands, to herbaceous/dwarf-shrub frost pockets. Grassy areas dominated by Schizachyrium scoparium with Lupinus perennis, Lespedeza capitata, and other forbs provide habitat for several rare invertebrates. Small changes in elevation can create pockets with saturated soil, where shrubs such as Corylus americana, Cephalanthus occidentalis, Vaccinium corymbosum, and Alnus spp. form dense cover. These barrens always have a history of recurrent fires, and fire is required to maintain them.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Environment
This system is confined to flat to gently rolling plains with sandy soils that are coarse-textured, acidic, mostly well-drained to xeric, and low in nutrients.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Dynamics
Fire regime includes frequent stand-replacing events and lower intensity surface fires. Periodic severe wildfires with 40- to 100-year intervals have produced oak-pine mixtures over extensive areas of uplands, while more frequent severe fires have created mixtures of pitch pine and shrub oaks. Pitch pine younger than 20-40 years may produce stump sprouts after top-killing fire (Andresen 1959). If not top-killed, pines may recover from fire by sprouting from branches and trunk. Pitch pine has. Additionally, pitch pine is quick to maturity and to produce seeds. Frequent fires of moderate to high intensity/severity eventually eliminate all other tree species except for scrub oak and pitch pine, which has thick, fire-resistant bark and is a prolific seed producer. Fires, especially large wildfires, have been a major factor in the development of the present differences among forest stands on similar sites in the Pine Barrens. Abandoned upland sites generally progress from a grass or shrubland (MFRI of 2-3? years) to pitch pine/scrub oak woodland (5-25 years) to pure pitch pine forest with heath/oak scrublands (30-60 years) to pitch pine/tree-sized oak forest (60-100 years) to oak-hickory forest (100-200 years) (Landfire 2007a).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Threats
This system has faced widespread conversion to agriculture. Motzkin et al. (1999) note that areas currently occupied by pitch pine - scrub oak communities in central Massachusetts likely represent less than 10% of the area that supported this vegetation in the early historical period. Agricultural activity has been documented since the mid-19th century at Waterboro Barrens in Maine (Copenheaver et al. 2000), in addition to other land uses such as logging, charcoal production, and sand mining. Urban and commercial development continues to be a threat to this system, and as remaining patches become smaller and surrounded by development, they can no longer support the fire regime required to maintain the mosaic of vegetation types that make up this system. Other threats include invasive species and irresponsible recreation activities (Gray and Dawson 2004). Another threat is the degradation in ecological integrity that results from re-establishment of barrens following cessation of agriculture. Motzkin et al. (1999) note that those barrens with soils that have been plowed are depauperate and differ in their composition and structure. [Note: With increasing temperatures and decreased drying projected in the coming decades, it is possible that these effects of climate change may foster continued existence of pine barrens if sufficient protection measures are put in place.]
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Distribution
This system is restricted to interior south-central New England; Colchester, Vermont; eastern New York; and the Pennsylvania Poconos.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Ecologically Associated Plant Species

Plant species that characterize this ecosystem type, organized by vegetation stratum. These are species ecologically associated with the ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific area.

Tree canopy

Betula populifolia, Pinus rigida, Pinus strobus, Quercus ilicifolia, Quercus prinoides, Quercus rubra

Shrub/sapling (tall & short)

Cephalanthus occidentalis, Corylus americana, Gaylussacia baccata, Rhododendron canadense, Vaccinium corymbosum

Short shrub/sapling

Comptonia peregrina

Herb (field)

Hieracium venosum, Lespedeza capitata, Lupinus perennis, Schizachyrium scoparium
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Ecologically Associated Animals (11)

Animal species ecologically associated with this ecosystem type based on NatureServe assessment. These are species whose habitat requirements overlap with this ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific roadless area.

Mammals (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
White-footed DeermousePeromyscus leucopusG5

Reptiles (2)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
North American RacerColuber constrictorG5
Eastern Hog-nosed SnakeHeterodon platirhinosG5

Butterflies & Moths (8)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Dusted SkipperAtrytonopsis hiannaG4G5
Frosted ElfinCallophrys irusG3
Eastern Pine ElfinCallophrys niphonG5
Persius DuskywingErynnis persiusG5
Eastern BuckmothHemileuca maiaG5
Cobweb SkipperHesperia meteaG4
Karner BluePlebejus samuelisG1G2
Edwards' HairstreakSatyrium edwardsiiG4
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
At-Risk Species Associated with this Ecosystem (2)

Species with conservation concern that are ecologically associated with this ecosystem type. G-Rank indicates global conservation status: G1 (critically imperiled) through G5 (secure). ESA status indicates U.S. Endangered Species Act listing.

Common NameScientific NameG-RankESA Status
Frosted ElfinCallophrys irusG3--
Karner BluePlebejus samuelisG1G2Endangered
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Component Associations (8)

Plant community associations that occur within this ecological system. Associations are the finest level of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) and describe specific, repeating assemblages of plant species. Each association represents a distinct community type that may be found where this ecosystem occurs.

NameG-Rank
Pinus rigida / Quercus ilicifolia / Lespedeza capitata WoodlandG2 NatureServe
Pinus rigida / Quercus ilicifolia / Piptatheropsis pungens WoodlandG2 NatureServe
Pinus rigida - Quercus ilicifolia - Rhododendron canadense WoodlandG1 NatureServe
Pinus rigida - Quercus (velutina, montana) ForestGNR NatureServe
Pinus rigida / Vaccinium spp. - Gaylussacia baccata WoodlandG4 NatureServe
Pinus strobus - Pinus resinosa - Pinus rigida ForestG4 NatureServe
Quercus ilicifolia ShrublandGNR NatureServe
Vaccinium angustifolium / Schizachyrium scoparium - Carex lucorum Shrub GrasslandGNR NatureServe
State Conservation Ranks (8)

Subnational conservation status ranks (S-ranks) assigned by Natural Heritage Programs in each state where this ecosystem occurs. S1 indicates critically imperiled at the state level, S2 imperiled, S3 vulnerable, S4 apparently secure, and S5 secure. An ecosystem may be globally secure but imperiled in specific states at the edge of its range.

StateS-Rank
CTSNR
MASNR
MESNR
NHSNR
NYSNR
PASNR
RISNR
VTSNR
Methodology and Data Sources

Ecosystem classification: Ecosystems are classified using the LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type (EVT) layer, mapped to NatureServe Terrestrial Ecological Systems via a curated crosswalk. Each EVT is linked to the USNVC (U.S. National Vegetation Classification) hierarchy through pixel-level co-occurrence analysis of LANDFIRE EVT and NatureServe IVC Group rasters across all roadless areas.

Vegetation coverage: Coverage percentages and hectares are derived from zonal statistics of the LANDFIRE 2024 EVT raster intersected with roadless area boundaries.

Ecosystem narratives and community species: Sourced from the NatureServe Explorer API, representing professional ecological assessments of vegetation composition, environmental setting, dynamics, threats, and characteristic species assemblages.

IVC hierarchy: The International Vegetation Classification hierarchy is sourced from the USNVC v3.0 Catalog, providing the full classification from Biome through Association levels.

Component associations: Plant community associations listed as components of each NatureServe Ecological System. Association data from the NatureServe Explorer API.

State ranks: Conservation status ranks assigned by NatureServe member programs in each state where the ecosystem occurs.