Great Lakes Pine-Oak Barrens

EVT 7407Laurentian Pine Barrens
CES201.718GNRTreeConifer
Summary
These pine-oak barrens occur in the northern and western Great Lakes region. They occur on sandplains/outwash habitats, with droughty, infertile sand or loamy sands and frequent fires (every 5-30 years). Pinus banksiana, Pinus resinosa, Quercus ellipsoidalis, and Pinus strobus are common overstory dominants. Prairie species are common throughout much of the range of the type. Common shrub and ground cover species include Andropogon gerardii, Carex pensylvanica, Corylus americana, Schizachyrium scoparium, and Vaccinium angustifolium. Oak grubs may be common under frequent burning. Catastrophic burns may create open bracken grasslands.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Environment
These barrens occur on sandy outwash plains, glacial lakeplains, and broad riverine terraces. Soils are generally infertile, coarse-textured, and acidic sands and loamy sands. The landscape is flat to gently rolling.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Dynamics
Fire and droughty soil conditions maintain the characteristic open tree/shrub canopy and prairie-like understory of this system. The dry, relatively infertile soil limits the rate of tree growth, while periodic fires remove most tree regeneration and, less commonly, canopy trees. Fires are also necessary for regeneration of Pinus banksiana. Sites with finer-textured and more fertile soils need greater fire frequency, while sites with coarser-textured, less fertile soils need less frequent fires to maintain this system. The historical fire-return interval is 5-20 years (Landfire 2007a). Fire-return intervals of 20-30 years result in abundant woody cover. Occasional frost during the growing season, sustained drought, and catastrophic winds can kill canopy trees (Quercus spp. would be more affected by frost) (Kost et al. 2007).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Threats
The main threats to this system are fire suppression, high grazing and browsing rates, conversion to pine plantations, landscape fragmentation, and logging. In the absence of fire, Quercus spp. and other hardwoods and deciduous shrubs spread, creating a short, dense woody canopy. This shades out the shade-intolerant herbaceous species and pines and makes future fires less likely, though possibly more severe if they occur. Sustained high grazing and browsing pressure can eliminate native herbaceous species and will favor woody shrubs and other species not preferred by livestock or deer as well as provide more opportunities for invasive species. Landscape fragmentation due to agricultural and rural development disrupts the ecological processes under which this system developed, particularly fire, and can make managing stands through prescribed fire more difficult due to fragmented ownership and perceived threat to private property (WNHI 2012). Fragmentation also creates greater edge-to-interior ratio and increases the opportunities for introduction of exotic species. Logging is currently uncommon but previously occurred on pine-oak barrens and removed all the large overstory Pinus resinosa and Pinus strobus (Vogl 1964). Recreational use (off-road vehicles, in particular) can affect limited areas but also can serve as a source for introduction of invasive species that can tolerate the dry conditions, among them Centaurea biebersteinii (= Centaurea maculosa), Elaeagnus umbellata, Leucanthemum vulgare (= Chrysanthemum leucanthemum), Lonicera spp., Rhamnus cathartica, and Rosa multiflora. Due to the relatively infertile soils, this system recovers fairly slowly from disturbance, so effects can accumulate over time.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Distribution
Occurs in the northern and western Great Lakes region.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Ecologically Associated Plant Species

Plant species that characterize this ecosystem type, organized by vegetation stratum. These are species ecologically associated with the ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific area.

Tree canopy

Pinus banksiana, Pinus resinosa, Pinus strobus, Quercus ellipsoidalis, Quercus macrocarpa

Shrub/sapling (tall & short)

Corylus americana, Corylus cornuta

Short shrub/sapling

Vaccinium angustifolium

Herb (field)

Andropogon gerardi, Botrychium michiganense, Carex pensylvanica, Schizachyrium scoparium
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Ecologically Associated Animals (23)

Animal species ecologically associated with this ecosystem type based on NatureServe assessment. These are species whose habitat requirements overlap with this ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific roadless area.

Mammals (3)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Indiana MyotisMyotis sodalisG2
Eastern Fox SquirrelSciurus nigerG5
Eastern ChipmunkTamias striatusG5

Birds (4)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Ruffed GrouseBonasa umbellusG5
Red-headed WoodpeckerMelanerpes erythrocephalusG5
Wild TurkeyMeleagris gallopavoG5
Kirtland's WarblerSetophaga kirtlandiiG3

Reptiles (2)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Eastern Hog-nosed SnakeHeterodon platirhinosG5
Eastern FoxsnakePantherophis vulpinusG5

Butterflies & Moths (6)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
a noctuid mothAbagrotis crypticaG1G3Q
Boreal Fan MothBrachionycha borealisG4
Relict Dart MothDichagyris reliquaG2
Persius DuskywingErynnis persius persiusG5T1T3
Blazing Star Stem BorerPapaipema beerianaG3?
Karner BluePlebejus samuelisG1G2

Insects (5)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Michigan Bog GrasshopperAppalachia arcanaG2G3
American Burying BeetleNicrophorus americanusG3
St. Croix SnaketailOphiogomphus susbehchaG2
Hine's EmeraldSomatochlora hineanaG2G3
Antenna-waving WaspTachysphex pechumaniG2G3

Other (3)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Meadow VoleMicrotus pennsylvanicusG5
Appalachian Grizzled SkipperPyrgus wyandotG1G2Q
Meadow Jumping MouseZapus hudsoniusG5
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
At-Risk Species Associated with this Ecosystem (14)

Species with conservation concern that are ecologically associated with this ecosystem type. G-Rank indicates global conservation status: G1 (critically imperiled) through G5 (secure). ESA status indicates U.S. Endangered Species Act listing.

Common NameScientific NameG-RankESA Status
a noctuid mothAbagrotis crypticaG1G3Q--
Michigan Bog GrasshopperAppalachia arcanaG2G3--
Michigan MoonwortBotrychium michiganenseG3--
Relict Dart MothDichagyris reliquaG2--
Persius DuskywingErynnis persius persiusG5T1T3--
Indiana MyotisMyotis sodalisG2Endangered
American Burying BeetleNicrophorus americanusG3Threatened; Experimental population, non-essential
St. Croix SnaketailOphiogomphus susbehchaG2--
Blazing Star Stem BorerPapaipema beerianaG3?--
Karner BluePlebejus samuelisG1G2Endangered
Appalachian Grizzled SkipperPyrgus wyandotG1G2Q--
Kirtland's WarblerSetophaga kirtlandiiG3Delisted
Hine's EmeraldSomatochlora hineanaG2G3Endangered
Antenna-waving WaspTachysphex pechumaniG2G3--
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Component Associations (8)

Plant community associations that occur within this ecological system. Associations are the finest level of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) and describe specific, repeating assemblages of plant species. Each association represents a distinct community type that may be found where this ecosystem occurs.

NameG-Rank
Pinus banksiana - (Pinus resinosa) - Quercus ellipsoidalis / Carex pensylvanica ForestG4 NatureServe
Pinus banksiana - Pinus resinosa - (Quercus ellipsoidalis) / Carex pensylvanica Wooded GrasslandG3 NatureServe
Pinus banksiana - (Quercus ellipsoidalis) / Schizachyrium scoparium - Prairie Forbs WoodlandG2 NatureServe
Pinus banksiana / Vaccinium spp. / Pleurozium schreberi WoodlandG4 NatureServe
Pinus strobus - Quercus alba - (Quercus velutina) / Andropogon gerardii Wooded GrasslandG2 NatureServe
Populus tremuloides - Quercus (ellipsoidalis, macrocarpa) / Andropogon gerardii Scrub GrasslandGNR NatureServe
Pteridium aquilinum - Bromus kalmii GrasslandGNR NatureServe
Quercus ellipsoidalis - (Quercus macrocarpa) ForestG4 NatureServe
State Conservation Ranks (3)

Subnational conservation status ranks (S-ranks) assigned by Natural Heritage Programs in each state where this ecosystem occurs. S1 indicates critically imperiled at the state level, S2 imperiled, S3 vulnerable, S4 apparently secure, and S5 secure. An ecosystem may be globally secure but imperiled in specific states at the edge of its range.

StateS-Rank
MISNR
MNSNR
WISNR
Methodology and Data Sources

Ecosystem classification: Ecosystems are classified using the LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type (EVT) layer, mapped to NatureServe Terrestrial Ecological Systems via a curated crosswalk. Each EVT is linked to the USNVC (U.S. National Vegetation Classification) hierarchy through pixel-level co-occurrence analysis of LANDFIRE EVT and NatureServe IVC Group rasters across all roadless areas.

Vegetation coverage: Coverage percentages and hectares are derived from zonal statistics of the LANDFIRE 2024 EVT raster intersected with roadless area boundaries.

Ecosystem narratives and community species: Sourced from the NatureServe Explorer API, representing professional ecological assessments of vegetation composition, environmental setting, dynamics, threats, and characteristic species assemblages.

IVC hierarchy: The International Vegetation Classification hierarchy is sourced from the USNVC v3.0 Catalog, providing the full classification from Biome through Association levels.

Component associations: Plant community associations listed as components of each NatureServe Ecological System. Association data from the NatureServe Explorer API.

State ranks: Conservation status ranks assigned by NatureServe member programs in each state where the ecosystem occurs.