Midwestern and Appalachian Rich Swamp

EVT 9178North-Central Interior and Appalachian Rich Swamp
CES202.605GNRTreeRiparian
Summary
These forested wetlands are scattered throughout the north-central Midwest (south of the Laurentian region), the north-central Appalachians and southern New England at low to mid elevations. They are found in basins where higher pH and/or nutrient levels are associated with a rich flora. Species include Acer rubrum, Fraxinus nigra, as well as calciphilic herbs. Conifers include Larix laricina, but typically not Thuja occidentalis, which is characteristic of more northern wetland systems. There may be shrubby or herbaceous openings within the primarily wooded cover. The substrate is primarily mineral soil, but there may be some peat development.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Environment
Water can come from nutrient-rich groundwater or surface runoff. Sites are basins or low areas in floodplains, usually near the edge of the floodplain in a localized basin or at the base of a bluff where groundwater emerges. Soils are muck or fine-textured mineral. Small hummocks and depressions, created from tree tip-ups, sluggish streams, or tree root build up, create drier and wetter microsites within the system. Sites are usually flooded in the spring, and low areas may remain wet for all or most of the growing season, but if stands remain under water for multiple years, the trees die (Kost et al. 2007). The microsite differences allow a mixture of wet-mesic upland species and wetland species to exist in the herbaceous layer of this system (WDNR 2015).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Dynamics
The hydrologic regime is critical to maintenance of this system. Sites must be wet or flooded for part of the growing season but not completely saturated or under water for too long over a large portion of the site. Periodic sustained floods or droughts can kill canopy trees and allow the mostly shade-intolerant canopy trees (Fraxinus nigra, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Larix laricina) to regenerate. Trees are shallowly rooted in this system so wind can blow canopy trees over relatively easily. This creates gaps in the canopy and allows smaller trees enough light to reach the canopy. Windthrow contributes to hummock-and-hollow microtopography, which generates small-scale gradients in soil moisture and chemistry, contributing to floristic diversity.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Threats
Alterations in wetland hydrology, logging, invasive plants, and emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) are the prime threats to this system. Hydrologic alterations can occur due to ditching, road construction, or quarrying/mining that affect groundwater or surface waterflows into sites. Both reductions and increases in groundwater or surface water input can negatively affect this system. Partial drainage of a site can allow upland species to colonize. Increased surface waterflow can flood these swamps, changing both the hydrologic regime and water chemistry. This would likely lead to tree death and the development of a herbaceous marsh or shrub swamp. The proximity of roads has been shown to be negatively correlated with black ash health in Minnesota (Ward et al. 2006). Increased flooding can also transport sediment and higher nutrient loads. Logging can negatively impact this system through removal of trees, compaction of the soil, and creation of ruts. A serious threat to stands of this system that contain Fraxinus spp. is emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis). This exotic beetle has seriously affected Fraxinus spp. trees in southern Michigan and is projected to continue to spread throughout the range of Fraxinus spp. in the Midwest and Northeast by 2045 (DeSantis et al. 2012). After prolonged infestation, mortality of Fraxinus spp. is nearly 100% (Herms et al. 2010). Invasive plant species that can reduce diversity and alter community structure of this system include Elaeagnus umbellata, Frangula alnus (= Rhamnus frangula), Lythrum salicaria, Phalaris arundinacea, Phragmites australis, Rosa multiflora, Typha angustifolia, and Typha x glauca. Frangula alnus is especially problematic because it is capable of completely dominating the shrub and ground layers and altering a sites hydrology and soil nutrient characteristics (Kost et al. 2007).
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Distribution
This system is found from central New England to the southern Great Lakes and south-central Minnesota south to northern Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. It is not known to extend south into the Southern Blue Ridge.
Source: NatureServe Explorer
Ecologically Associated Plant Species

Plant species that characterize this ecosystem type, organized by vegetation stratum. These are species ecologically associated with the ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific area.

Tree canopy

Acer rubrum, Fraxinus nigra, Larix laricina, Thuja occidentalis, Tsuga canadensis

Shrub/sapling (tall & short)

Rhamnus alnifolia

Herb (field)

Micranthes pensylvanica, Poa paludigena, Tiarella cordifolia, Veratrum viride
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Ecologically Associated Animals (8)

Animal species ecologically associated with this ecosystem type based on NatureServe assessment. These are species whose habitat requirements overlap with this ecosystem, not confirmed present in any specific roadless area.

Mammals (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Star-nosed MoleCondylura cristataG5

Reptiles (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Kirtland's SnakeClonophis kirtlandiiG2

Amphibians (5)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Spotted SalamanderAmbystoma maculatumG5
Four-toed SalamanderHemidactylium scutatumG5
Green FrogLithobates clamitansG5
Eastern NewtNotophthalmus viridescensG5
Spring PeeperPseudacris cruciferG5

Butterflies & Moths (1)

Common NameScientific NameG-Rank
Dukes' SkipperEuphyes dukesiG3G4
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
At-Risk Species Associated with this Ecosystem (3)

Species with conservation concern that are ecologically associated with this ecosystem type. G-Rank indicates global conservation status: G1 (critically imperiled) through G5 (secure). ESA status indicates U.S. Endangered Species Act listing.

Common NameScientific NameG-RankESA Status
Kirtland's SnakeClonophis kirtlandiiG2--
Dukes' SkipperEuphyes dukesiG3G4--
Bog BluegrassPoa paludigenaG3G4--
Source: NatureServe Ecological System assessment
Component Associations (6)

Plant community associations that occur within this ecological system. Associations are the finest level of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) and describe specific, repeating assemblages of plant species. Each association represents a distinct community type that may be found where this ecosystem occurs.

NameG-Rank
Acer rubrum - Fraxinus nigra - Betula alleghaniensis / Veratrum viride - Carex bromoides Seep Forest NatureServe
Acer rubrum - Fraxinus nigra - (Larix laricina) / Rhamnus alnifolia Swamp NatureServe
Acer rubrum - Fraxinus nigra - (Tsuga canadensis) / Tiarella cordifolia Swamp NatureServe
Acer (rubrum, saccharinum) - Fraxinus spp. - Ulmus americana Swamp NatureServe
Fraxinus nigra - Acer rubrum / Rhamnus alnifolia / Carex leptalea Swamp NatureServe
Larix laricina - Acer rubrum / (Rhamnus alnifolia, Vaccinium corymbosum) Swamp NatureServe
State Conservation Ranks (15)

Subnational conservation status ranks (S-ranks) assigned by Natural Heritage Programs in each state where this ecosystem occurs. S1 indicates critically imperiled at the state level, S2 imperiled, S3 vulnerable, S4 apparently secure, and S5 secure. An ecosystem may be globally secure but imperiled in specific states at the edge of its range.

StateS-Rank
CTSNR
ILSNR
INSNR
MASNR
MDSNR
MISNR
MNSNR
NHSNR
NJSNR
NYSNR
OHSNR
PASNR
RISNR
VTSNR
WISNR
Methodology and Data Sources

Ecosystem classification: Ecosystems are classified using the LANDFIRE 2024 Existing Vegetation Type (EVT) layer, mapped to NatureServe Terrestrial Ecological Systems via a curated crosswalk. Each EVT is linked to the USNVC (U.S. National Vegetation Classification) hierarchy through pixel-level co-occurrence analysis of LANDFIRE EVT and NatureServe IVC Group rasters across all roadless areas.

Vegetation coverage: Coverage percentages and hectares are derived from zonal statistics of the LANDFIRE 2024 EVT raster intersected with roadless area boundaries.

Ecosystem narratives and community species: Sourced from the NatureServe Explorer API, representing professional ecological assessments of vegetation composition, environmental setting, dynamics, threats, and characteristic species assemblages.

IVC hierarchy: The International Vegetation Classification hierarchy is sourced from the USNVC v3.0 Catalog, providing the full classification from Biome through Association levels.

Component associations: Plant community associations listed as components of each NatureServe Ecological System. Association data from the NatureServe Explorer API.

State ranks: Conservation status ranks assigned by NatureServe member programs in each state where the ecosystem occurs.